• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell again in '09 Pornhub was working clean on an identical stack with very few servers (when you think about the site visitors).In case you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, but they saw a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only thing bleeding is my eyes after i see one thing that could be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as a substitute is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you surprise if the dude who wrote it truly is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs together because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller players are often utilizing outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the online is. Hence why Wordpress remains to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps definitely are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, just that the majority generally tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that had been forward of their time may help us to know whether or not we are truly ready to live on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know which you can create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that characterize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. When we create something new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it could have in the world during which it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that often means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, even though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, xhamster it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological growth supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anybody involved in a tablet had in all probability been ready for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that really prepared the world for the pill laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world in which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cell screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and applied sciences which are commonplace at this time made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t fairly ready and so they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod actually should get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast loss of life after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, every main tech company is either making a face pc or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then time and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gasoline powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic concept of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.