• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was operating easy on an analogous stack with only a few servers (when you think about the visitors).In case you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the only ones needing it, however they noticed a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only factor bleeding is my eyes after i see something that may very well be wiped up in a regular PHP/Python/Ruby stack however instead is made with so many dependencies and 3rd celebration library that you simply wonder if the dude who wrote it actually is aware of programming or if he simply glued cool techs collectively because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But yes, the smaller players are normally utilizing outdated stuff, then again 99% of the net is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps definitely are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, just that almost all have a tendency to not buy the hype.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time may help us to know whether we are truly able to live in the world we are making. Speculative fiction fans know you can create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the actual world is sort of exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create something new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of assist it will have on the planet in which it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, although his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, porn it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement provided higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anybody concerned about a tablet had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that actually ready the world for the tablet laptop was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world during which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small mobile display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies which are commonplace at the moment made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t fairly ready and they weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years before Minority Report advised us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first actually good or actually successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating but quick death after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.

But nearly a decade later, each main tech company is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which time and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, just like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gas powered automobile car introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, nevertheless it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would pressure us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video name from Washington, D.C.